谁欲将艾滋感染者置于死地? |
|
2009年12月24日 09:15:17 搜狐 |
|
|
|
文/痛快人生
上个月,湖北当地媒体披露了一则消息,称“湖北崇阳县发现73例艾滋病感染者”。经网络转载后,这一消息广为传播。看到这一消息后,原本辛辛苦苦通过招商引资吸引过来的投资商很多都打起了退堂鼓。而更多的艾滋感染者则是寝食难安,生活受到严重的影响。
事实上,据报道,崇阳的病例数依然在全国平均水平以下,“并不是很严重”,“当初是根据省里的要求组织记者下去采访的,本来是说崇阳这方面的工作做得很好。”但现在几乎成了一个公开的秘密,那么,到底是谁泄露了秘密,将这些艾滋感染者大白于天下的?
本来艾滋感染者的个人资料属机密内容,由当地的疾控、卫生等部门掌控。或者是官方掌握一个大致的比例,对每位患者的姓名、年龄等个人资料当时严格保密,而这一泄密,是无意之中,还是人为而故意为之的?或者他们就是对艾滋感染者的极端歧视,导致了部分人员的人为泄密。
而据专家介绍,感染者“发现得越早越主动”,只要治疗方法得当可以实现长期存活。并且,政府还有相应的补助标准:据了解,湖北省对感染者的相关疾病治疗报销部分药费,一般家庭每个病人每年报销1000元,特困重症病人每年报销5000元。
虽然,一个不容回避的现实是,通过性传播感染艾滋病的比例正在逐年上升。而有的女性是被骗到外地从事皮肉生意后不幸被感染的,因为收入很高,但不懂基本的保护措施。几年过后回来时,被感染者想要过上平静的生活,已不再可能了。一旦被告知是艾滋感染者后,周围的居民等自然敬而远之。
艾滋感染者自身已经很痛苦,现在又要遭受舆论和周围人的无形压力,他们是受害者,但也是独立的社会个体,也有追求美好生活的权利,不应被社会抛弃。多给这些患者一些关爱,联合社会力量,心理救助比药物救助更为重要,而有关部门擅自泄密的行为,是否要掐灭他们生的一线希望?
而这些患者是否可以联合起来,状告当地的相关部门,私自将他们的个人资料泄露出去,导致他们的心理蒙上一层更深的社会阴影。而这一切,究竟是谁之过?当地的相关部门以及相关责任人可以逃脱道义上的谴责、甚至是法律上的惩处吗?且拭目以待!
|
Who is HIV-infected persons wishing to put to death?
December 24, 2009 09:15:17 SOHU
Text / jolly Life
Last month, Hubei Province, local media revealed a message, referred to as "Chongyang County, Hubei Province found that 73 cases of AIDS." Reproduced through the network, after the news spread widely. See this news, the original hard through attracting foreign investments attracted a lot of investors have pulled out playing drums. And more of the HIV-infected persons is no peace, whose livelihood has been seriously affected.
In fact, it was reported that the number of cases Chongyang still below the national average, "not very serious", "When the request is based on provincial journalists continue to cover the organization was originally said that the work done in this area Chongyang very good. "But now almost become an open secret, then, in the end who leaked the secret, these HIV-infected people shed light on it?
HIV-infected persons had a confidential personal data content, by the local disease control and health departments to control. Or is the official master an approximate ratio of each patient's name, age and other personal information was kept strictly confidential, and this disclosure is unintentional, or artificial and intentionally? Or they are HIV-infected persons on the extreme form of discrimination, leading to the artificial leak some of its staff.
According to experts, the infected person "is detected, the sooner the better", as long as the proper treatment of long-term survival can be achieved. Moreover, the government also grants the corresponding standards: It is understood that those infected Hubei treatment of diseases related to reimbursement of part of the drugs, the average family 1,000 yuan per patient per year for reimbursement, an annual reimbursement destitute 5,000 critically ill patients.
Although an unavoidable reality is that, by the proportion of sexually transmitted HIV infection is increasing every year. However, some women are deceived into the field in the flesh trade who are unfortunate to be infected, because the income is high, but do not understand the basic protective measures. After a few years back when he was infected people want to lead a quiet life, is no longer impossible. Once the HIV-infected person was told that after the residents of the surrounding natural distanced themselves from him.
HIV infection itself has been very painful, and now also subject to public opinion and pressure from those around them invisible, they are the victims, but also independent social entity, but also the right to pursue a better life should not be abandoned by society. Give these patients some love to the joint social forces, psychological assistance is more important than the aid of drugs, while the relevant acts of unauthorized disclosure, whether they are born to be a glimmer of hope snuffed?
Whether these patients together, sued the local relevant departments, unauthorized disclosure of their personal information out, leading to a deeper psychological level of social shadow cast. All of this, what is the blame? The local relevant departments, as well as the responsible person can escape moral condemnation, and even legal penalties do? Just wait and see!
|
|