I am glad to write to USA.gov again.I am a Chinese student.Yours genuineness really moved me. My dream is to be an economist of all the world.I will solve the  poor problem in the world,not only in my glad.But poor problem is very hard to understand.This always means the Social progress，but today I want to tell you not only in this ,I will tell you my advise to you about the higy unemployment in a long time since the Financial crisis。
        The unemployment rate has been plagued our problems, I say we mean the whole human, not just talking about China or America, and that the issue will probably continue to haunt us down.
         Long-term unemployment must be a supply shortage, society does not provide an opportunity to people to work hard, and long term unemployment represents a waste of resources, unemployed workers have the potential to contribute to national income, but failed to do so.
         I think that some developed countries on the United States and Europe the situation is often the high unemployment rate may still continue, but will gradually decline and stabilize, but it can not be too low, the 5% level should be very optimistic expectations, and these process may last a long time.
Solve the unemployment problem, the key is not the transfer of labor, but to create jobs, and this often means that economic growth, but the current situation is not optimistic. Economic growth and high unemployment counterparts. But today I am writing not to describe reality and the issue of compassion and complaints, the following are my views and suggestions. I think that some developed countries on the United States and Europe the situation is often the high unemployment rate may still continue, but will gradually decline and stabilize, but it can not be too low, the 5% level should be very optimistic expectations, and these process may last a long time.
           The ability of market mechanisms to allocate capital most of the time is admirable and compelling, but it is only applicable to less capital and more under the speculative market, and now I think the number of U.S. capital and liquidity is no problem, even can say that it is adequate, but Mr. Market under the excessive capital will make wrong judgments, only focus on short-term speculation rather than long-term investment, which the U.S. does not have substantial current benefits. Now, should act as the director of government intervention may be able to help but they do not belong to the Pareto efficient behavior, and play an effective role in resource allocation.
          Based on the above, first of all, I think the middle way Middle way Economics may be to solve the current economic difficulties, different countries and different periods of a country, government intervention and market mechanisms to measure how much difference there is often great. I think that their economic policies for each country should move, that is flexible and up. Middle way Economics from Paul Samuelson, he is one of the the greatest economists I've ever seen . This means that the U.S. unemployment rate can be resolved through a number of industrial policies, this is not a planned economy, only given to government intervention in a way you never try. I think that the current economic standard, not a single economy in the middle of the road to measure the weight of the two, so the decline to the current economic situation of the United States for consumption, inflation, manufacturing is never a good idea , and may be accompanied inflation and high unemployment.
           Also, I think the current American conservative, which is reflected in foreign trade on a conservative rather than monetary policy, indeed, short-term this will have a significant impact on the United States, but a progressive policy. And the long term, any policy of free trade would be a people's well-being.
           Finally, I think there is lack of confidence in the current American mood, and overly concerned about the future problems, and that the whole country is never a good thing. In fact, things work out.
          Science has no borders, no boundaries to help others, though I do not know if I can do it. This is my view of the whole world. Use the words of Albert Einstein The ideals which have lighted my way, and have given me new courage to face life cheerfully, that ideal is - truth, goodness and beauty.I will always love this world and always trying to heal the world a better place. 
           Really happy to write to you, in your sincere attitude seems very common in our national government might be rare in our country, which is that we should learn from you. 
Look forward to your reply!

中文版

    很高兴再次给你们写信，你们的真诚让我感动。
    失业率一直是困扰我们的问题，我说的我们指的是整个人类，而不单指China or America，而且这个问题或许将一直困扰我们下去。
    长期的失业问题一定是一个供给不足的问题，社会并没有提供一个人们努力工作的机会，并且长期来看失业代表着资源的浪费，失业工人有潜力对国民收入做出贡献，但没有这样做。
    我认为基于美国和欧洲一些发达国家的高失业率情况往往仍可能会持续下去，但将会逐渐下降和稳定下来，而却不可能太低，5%的水平应当是很乐观的预期了，这些历程可能会持续很长时间。
解决失业的问题，关键不在于转移劳动力，而是创造工作岗位，而这也往往意味着经济的增长，然而当前的情况并不容乐观。经济增长与高失业率同行。然而今天我写信不是来描述现实和发出同情和抱怨的，下面的是我的看法和建议。我认为基于美国和欧洲一些发达国家的高失业率情况往往仍可能会持续下去，但将会逐渐下降和稳定下来，而却不可能太低，5%的水平应当是很乐观的预期了，这些历程可能会持续很长时间。
     市场机制配置资本的能力大部分时间是值得钦佩和令人信服的，然而那只是适用于较少的资本和较多的投机市场下，而现在我认为美国资本的数量和流动性没有问题，甚至可以说很充足，而市场先生在过多的资本下会做出错误的判断，只注重于短期投机，而不是长期投资，这对当前的美国并不具备实质性的好处。而现在，应当充当导演的政府干预或许可以不免这些不属于帕累托效率的行为，并起到有效配置资源的作用。    
    基于以上，首先，我认为中间道路经济学可能会解决当前的困境，对不同的国家和一个国家的不同时期，政府干预和市场机制的多少衡量往往会有很大的差异。我认为针对每个国家其经济政策都应该动起来，即灵活起来。中间道路经济学源于保罗萨缪尔森，他是我见过的最伟大的经济学家之一。这意味着美国失业率可以通过一些产业政策来解决，这不是计划经济，只是赋予政府干预一个你们从未尝试的方法。我认为就目前的经济水平来说，不存在一个单一的中间道路经济学来衡量两者的权重，就现在的经济如此衰落的状况对于消费的美国来说，通货膨胀的制造永远不是一个好办法，而可能是通货膨胀与高失业率同行。
    另外，我认为当前的美国过于保守，这保守体现在对外贸易上而不是货币政策上，确实，短期这会对美国造成重大冲击，但可以采取渐进的政策。并且长期来看，任何关于自由贸易的政策都将是人们的福祉。
    最后，我认为当前美国存在信心不足的情绪，和对未来过分担忧的问题，而这对整个国家永远不是一个好事情。事实上，事情总会好转。
    科学没有国界，帮助别人也没有国界,虽然我不知道自己能否做到。这是我对于整个世界的看法。运用爱因斯坦的话说有些理想曾为我们引过道路，并不断给我新的勇气以欣然面对人生，那些理想就是——真、善、美。我永远热爱这个世界和永远在试图发现世界的美好之处。
    真的很高兴再次给你们写信，在你们看来很普通的诚恳态度，在我们国家政府中可能是很少见的，而这些是我们应当向你们学习的。

  期待你的来信！